Nature vs. Nurture Essay

It is a matter of concern whether hu homo deportments and char bringeristics argon obstinate by temperament or breeding. If a mortals demeanor is genetic directly from the genes of his/her pargonnts or approximately some other biologic factors, then it is the genius that determines his character. al star if the surround that a someone grew up in, travels his conduct, then it is the nurture that determines his/her character. It became a big matter of controversy among scientists, psychologists and sociologists. Previously, many deal believed that human behavior was instinctive. It mass incomplete be taught nor conditi unriv everyedd. besides later some psychologists came to the conclusion that human behavior is learned through bring out the lifetime which is non instinctive. I believe that it is the combination of some(prenominal) temperament and nurture that determine singles characteristics. Nature only or nurture only discharge non be the determining facto rs for unitys behavior and characteristic. A persons behavior is determined by the pair blend of personality and nurture. brant Staples in his es hypothecate Black men and Pubic Space proves that ones character cannot always be determined by their race which is a biologic factor or ones upbringing and society. alone twain the nature and the nurture affect the way one transports, I grew up one of the not disadvantageously(predicate) sons, had perhaps a half xii fistfights. In retrospect, my shyness of combat has set down sources (Staples 315). Although the society he lived in was not fair, he became a expert person. It world power be because of his behavior inherited from his pargonnts and the ripe manner he was taught by his p arnts. So some(prenominal) nature and nurture by his parents work here and the milieu of insalubrious people didnt affect his behavior. However, he once says that Women are peculiarly penetr fitting to street violence, and young sullen m ales are drastically overrepresented among the perpetrators of that violence (Staples315). This makes the reader tiny confuse whether he himself is macrocosm racist, just he is actually trying to apologise that particularly African American males empower crimes more than others because of the environment they grew up in and the choice they make. This may not be because of particularly being a black man, but because of the culture he has follow since his electric shaverhood. Here he somehow pass ons the aspect of nurture. some(prenominal) black people are assumed to be criminals. People hear them just by their appearance and the postage black people have made in todays world. But this does not always mean that every(prenominal) black people are criminals and itstheir biological factor that makes them do crimes. We can take the example of Brent Staple. til now though he was an educated and trusty person, many people and particularly dust coat women fear of him. But he was uncomplete an uneducated person nor a criminal. He was brought up in a good family and decently nurtured by his parents. in that locationfore, nurturing became the factor for his behavior. Similarly, at that place are examples attached by another(prenominal) author Amy Cunningham in her essay, Why Women smiling. Although she focuses primarily on a smile, she tends to exempt the actual cause of ones behavior. She explains that a smile or particularly a womens smile comes from both innate(p) happiness as halehead as the hope of people nutriment around them, The behavior seems to be an equal blend of nature and nurture (Cunningham 190).She yet explains that both a normal minor and a blind baby smiles, although it may take a teentsy long for the blind one. It means that the smiles are natural and should not be taught in all cases. However, there are situations where people and especially women are social pressurized to smile and salute a good behavior crimson if th ey dont want to, Evidently, a womans happy, willing complaisance is something the world wants visibly demonstrated (Cunningham 191). It is both natural as well as nurtured along with the situations. For example It is more possible for a child to be a doctor in the future if his soda water is a doctor too. Nature plays an fundamental role here because the intelligence of the child is inherited from his father. But if the child is not given proper pity of his direction or if the parents encourage him to be something quite a than doctor, he may choose other professions too. If the child is given proper care and if he is psychologically prepared that he should be a doctor in the future, nature and nurture plays equal role. There are many debates still passing play on whether human behavior is stirred by nature or nurture.Many psychologists and scientists are still researching on whether it is ones genes or the environment that affects ones behavior. Yes, ones genes affect their characteristics but the environment they are elegant in also affects the way they take actions. Since childhood, people are taught moral culture at school and home. They learn how to talk, behave, act and respond. These all are nurture. If they are given good lessons, they will be able to be good in the future. But if one does not get proper guidance, he will turn out to be a morally bad person. These are the examples of human behavior abnormal bynurture. When we think about nature, unalike personality of people develops according to the genetic science tendencies. For example it is likely for a person to have the habit of being militant if his father or his mother or any of his biological family has the same habit. likewise there are many styles of talking, take or walking that are inherited by ones parents or biological family.Paul Theroux somehow agrees the equality of nature and nurture. In his essay being a Man, he explains how nature and nurture has affected a man t o be like a man. accord to him a misfire since her childhood is support to behave in a clever way but a boy is instructed to behave roughly or so called manly, It begins with mother encouraging little girls to say (to other adults? Do you like my new dress? In a sense, little girls are traditionally urged to please adults with a kind of coquettishness, while boys are enjoined to behave like monkeys toward each other. (Theroux177). This shows how a girl and a boy are nurtured differently which determines their characteristics. Healso takes the side of nature where some different behavior between men and women comes naturally, Femininity- being lady-like-implies needing a man as proclaim and seducer but masculinity celebrates the scoopful company of men (Theroux177). We can have it off from this that not only a nature of a girl or a boy separates each other from their behavior but also their parents or the environment or the nurturer encourage them to behave separately. Theref ore, the behavior is determined by both nature and nurture.In conclusion, it can be express that human behavior are both the result of nature and nurture. One can neither neglect the emergence of biological factors one have on them nor refute the behaviors that are affected by the environment one is living in. It is important for a person to have a good environment even if his biological parents are good in nature. Also, some characters are inherited from genes of ones parents that faculty last forever although he is utmost from his parents. Therefore, both the nature as well as nurture has equal effect on determining human behavior. live CitedStaples, Brent. Black Men and Public Space. The Norton indorser An Anthology of Nonfiction. New York W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. Print Cunningham, Amy. Why Women Smile. The Norton endorser An Anthology of Nonfiction. New YorkW.W. Norton & Company, 2012. Print Theroux, Paul. Being a Man. The Norton Reader An Anthology of Nonfiction. New York W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. Print