"12 Angry Men": A case analysis of the classic movie with Henry Fonda from a management perspective

Part 1 How would you describe the aggroup task? The group task is to pip an unanimous decision. They have to do their duty, they have to sphere a consenus decision, so they ar forced to have a dialogue with an uttermost(a) diverse set of people. Why conflict arises? When they bring to pass a preceding vote, they find out that one juryman think the incriminate is not guilty beyond mediocre doubts. The separate 11 jurors are surprised and then quite wrothful that HF does not see the obvious guilt in the case. negate arise because of a different understanding of the reality, of different personalised situations (and prejudices) and patronizegrounds. The environment, the very luscious jury room and that the men flex more and more weary enlarges all this too. What does HF/JL do to earnings make up ones mind? He instills doubt. He argues that it is wrong, even illegal, to send someone to death when theres reasonable doubt. freshman HF convinces another juror that the evidence is not proven. HF shows that every vote is worth as lots as the other ones, even if he is in nonage and quality jamd. What does HF/JL do not do to win ferment? HF maintained his composure, maintained diplomatic and tactful.

Even as the loner who disagreed with everyone, he never once let the others blackjack him into thinking differently. Despite that, he also never fought back down with anger, never raised his voice, said the accused was innocent, claimed the other jurors were wrong. He never gave the others a reason to hate him with a personal vengeance. Part 2 Does HF/JL maintain the same strategy as in part 1? Rat her than academic term back and allowing th! e others to prove wherefore he is wrong, he speaks up in part 2. He becomes more active, and... If you want to fasten a full essay, sound out it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay